Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 13:50:54 GMT 8
The parliamentary groups that allowed Sánchez's investiture as well as the approval of the general budgets, have committed to registering a Law to Guarantee the Right to Housing , prepared by the main organizations that defend the right to housing, the majority labor unions and a wide range of social organizations. This step is taken after several months of stagnation, in which housing organizations: the Platform for People Affected by Mortgage, the Tenants' Union and the Nobody Homeless Movement, have been warning of the need to approve a new Housing Law. Housing that responds to the structural housing crisis, puts an end to evictions and guarantees access to housing with measures such as rent regulation. The proposed law will be registered next Thursday the 30th in the Congress of Deputies and its content will be made public through a press conference the same day at 10 a.m. in front of Congress. The parties that will register it are Unidas Podemos, Más País, Bildu, Esquerra Republicana de Cataluña, CUP, Compromís, Benegá and Canarian Coalition.
According to a study by the Alternativas Foundation on what Spaniards think about justice in Spain, “the data are not positive because the vast majority do not have confidence in justice nor do they think that it works as well as it should.” There are many citizens who, in their opinions or conversations, with explicit criticism, consider “the judges” simply as officials at the Australia Phone Number service of certain ideologies and political parties. Taking into account that the cases in which the covert judicial submission to economic or political interests constitute the great exception, it is enough for a few to be so, so that these servile judges can strongly damage the image of justice as a whole and that the Citizen confidence in judicial institutions has fallen to worrying levels, as surveys indicate daily.
Added to this is the fact that his election and appointment do not meet the conditions of legal democratic objectivity and impartiality: “experientia docet”; It has been and is being evident that the appointments of the high judicial institutions (Constitutional Court, General Council of the Judiciary, Court of Accounts...), for a large part of the citizens, have reached levels of self-interested politicization that are difficult to justify and, moreover, seeing how politicians in Parliament, as established by the Constitution, for convenience and spurious interests, do not agree to appoint new judges in a timely manner; Added to this is the inability of those magistrates who, having more than fulfilled the term for which they were appointed, do not have the ethical dignity to resign. The discredit to which certain judges subject the administration of justice with their clumsy sentences leave too many unsewn wounds in the souls of many citizens.
According to a study by the Alternativas Foundation on what Spaniards think about justice in Spain, “the data are not positive because the vast majority do not have confidence in justice nor do they think that it works as well as it should.” There are many citizens who, in their opinions or conversations, with explicit criticism, consider “the judges” simply as officials at the Australia Phone Number service of certain ideologies and political parties. Taking into account that the cases in which the covert judicial submission to economic or political interests constitute the great exception, it is enough for a few to be so, so that these servile judges can strongly damage the image of justice as a whole and that the Citizen confidence in judicial institutions has fallen to worrying levels, as surveys indicate daily.
Added to this is the fact that his election and appointment do not meet the conditions of legal democratic objectivity and impartiality: “experientia docet”; It has been and is being evident that the appointments of the high judicial institutions (Constitutional Court, General Council of the Judiciary, Court of Accounts...), for a large part of the citizens, have reached levels of self-interested politicization that are difficult to justify and, moreover, seeing how politicians in Parliament, as established by the Constitution, for convenience and spurious interests, do not agree to appoint new judges in a timely manner; Added to this is the inability of those magistrates who, having more than fulfilled the term for which they were appointed, do not have the ethical dignity to resign. The discredit to which certain judges subject the administration of justice with their clumsy sentences leave too many unsewn wounds in the souls of many citizens.